ArticleScientific reports2026
Federated TinyML and digital twin framework for secure and resilient IoMT-based ICU monitoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resource-constrained medical sensing devices are increasingly expected to support local intelligence, privacy-preserving collaboration, and secure communication in Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) environments. However, deploying federated learning in ICU monitoring remains challenging because hospital data are often non-IID, model updates may be adversarially poisoned, and emerging quantum-security threats require stronger communication protection. This paper presents a federated TinyML framework with an edge-hosted patient-state Digital Twin layer for ICU monitoring. The Digital Twin component is implemented as a lightweight patient-state representation rather than a full physiological simulator. It maintains recent physiological observations, temporal risk trends, predicted status labels, and interpretable alert information at the hospital gateway. Patient-specific adaptation is therefore achieved through individualized temporal state tracking and risk-history synchronization, while the predictive model is collaboratively learned across hospitals. The suggested framework employs decision-tree ensembles due to their lightweight nature, efficient inference capabilities, and interpretability inherent to ESP32-class devices. As decision tree structures are not amenable to average aggregation like neural network parameters, the aggregation of local client models is done via the validation-based ensemble fusion. In order to enhance the resistance of the framework to attacks based on poisoning clients, the Performance-Based Filtering (PBF) method analyzes the performance of each local ensemble against a trusted validation set and excludes low-quality local ensembles from the subsequent global ensemble aggregation. The secure model exchange process utilizes ML-KEM-512 key encapsulation scheme in combination with AES-256-GCM authenticated encryption. The extra overhead of the crypto layer is 0.09 ms per update exchange. The framework is evaluated using a clinician-reviewed synthetic ICU monitoring dataset distributed across three non-IID hospital clients and externally benchmarked using a PhysioNet-based critical-care dataset constructed from shared physiological features. The prediction task uses five status categories: normal, mild, moderate, critical, and an outlier/anomaly category; these labels represent synthetic severity-status classes rather than prospectively validated ICU endpoints. Under a targeted label-flipping attack in which one client relabels critical cases as normal, the proposed PBF strategy achieves 86.79% accuracy, 0.782 macro-F1, 0.904 critical-class recall, 0.837 critical-class F1-score, 0.947 macro-AUROC, and 0.799 macro-AUPRC on the synthetic ICU evaluation. External benchmarking at [Formula: see text] achieves 98.04% accuracy, 0.959 macro-F1, 0.977 critical-class recall, 0.987 critical-class F1-score, 0.999 macro-AUROC, and 0.983 macro-AUPRC. Comparative evaluation against FedAvg, Krum, Trimmed Mean, and Coordinate Median shows that PBF provides stronger protection of critical-class recall under adversarial conditions, although full prospective clinical validation remains outside the scope of this study. Overall, the results indicate that a federated TinyML architecture with lightweight patient-state tracking, validation-based ensemble filtering, differential privacy, and post-quantum-secure communication can support privacy-aware and attack-resilient ICU monitoring experiments in resource-constrained IoMT settings. The study should be interpreted as a technical feasibility and robustness evaluation rather than a fully integrated clinical Digital Twin deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.