ArticlePediatric research2026
Hemodynamic effect of delayed cord clamping versus early cord clamping in preterm twins using echocardiography: a prospective observational study.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo compare echocardiographic metrics in preterm twins who underwent delayed cord clamping (DCC) versus early cord clamping (ECC).
methodsProspective observational cohort study conducted at CHU Sainte Justine in Montreal involving preterm neonates between 24 and 36 weeks of gestational age. Neonates with congenital malformations, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, and the need of ECC for resuscitation were excluded. Echocardiography assessed the systemic blood flow.
results63 twins were included: 47 neonates receiving DCC, and 16 undergoing ECC. Superior vena cava (SVC) blood flow was comparable between the DCC and ECC groups at 6-9 h (78 ± 26.9 vs. 62 ± 20.1 mL/kg/min; p = 0.08) and 24-48 h (106 ± 31.2 vs. 87 ± 23.1 mL/kg/min; p = 0.07). Left ventricular output (LVO) was higher in the ECC group at 24-48 h (153 ± 30 vs. 187 ± 66 mL/kg/min; p = 0.01). TAPSE Z-score was higher in the DCC group at 24-48 h (-0.1 ± 1.9 vs. -1.1 ± 2.2 cm, p = 0.04). Systolic velocity of the right ventricle lateral wall was higher in the DCC group.
conclusionIn preterm twins, DCC was associated with improved echocardiographic indicators of cardiovascular stability and improved right ventricular function suggesting a potential benefit of DCC in this population. IMPACT: This prospective study implies a potential benefit of delayed cord clamping in a population of preterm twins and suggests to perform delayed cord clamping in this population.
Identifiers
42471467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.