ArticleScientific reports2026
Causal responsibility based explainable AI for vibrational spectroscopy applied to oral FTIR and oesophageal Raman diagnostics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical applications of vibrational spectroscopy increasingly use deep learning, but these models often give classifications without revealing which spectral features drive their decisions. We introduce Spec-ReX, a causal responsibility-based explainable AI method for vibrational spectroscopy, and compare it with the widely used explainability methods SHAP and Grad-CAM across synthetic spectra, biochemical mixtures, oral FTIR tissue spectra and oesophageal Raman tissue spectra. In a definitive in silico experiment with known discriminative peaks, Spec-ReX achieved the highest ground truth localisation, with an Intersection over Union of 0.10 and attribution concentration of 0.56, compared with 0.09 and 0.26 for the next best method. In an ambiguous in silico experiment, SHAP achieved the highest positive hit rate, while Spec-ReX was most robust to removal of low-importance regions, consistent with a sensitivity-specificity trade-off. In the in vitro biochemical experiment, Spec-ReX was again the most robust to removal of low-importance regions, while SHAP performed best when removing high-importance regions. In the ex vivo datasets, where no definitive attribution ground truth was available, the methods returned different and architecture-dependent attribution patterns. Overall, Spec-ReX provides sparse and specific model-causal responsibility maps for spectral classifiers. These explanations pertain to trained model behaviour rather than biological causality, and their clinical utility remains to be validated through user-centred studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42471431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.