ArticleNature communications2026
Engineering microbial consortia for distributed signal processing.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered E. coli swarming for binary and analog input recording.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Engineering microbial consortia for distributed signal processing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Linear scaling reveals low-dimensional structure in observable microbial dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Transposon-plasmid nesting enables fast response to fluctuating environments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central goal in biology is to infer input signals from measurable readouts. Engineered biosensors are usually built to respond selectively to single inputs, so crosstalk between sensors must be removed through laborious, context-specific orthogonalization. Here we show that multiplexed concentrations can be inferred without eliminating crosstalk. We distribute sensing across a microbial community and decode its time-resolved collective response, which can disambiguate combinations of chemical inputs even when individual sensors show crosstalk or respond indirectly. A computational framework coupling kinetic modeling with machine learning maps these community dynamics to input concentrations. We demonstrate quantitative inference in communities with low or high sensor crosstalk, in communities that respond only indirectly to antibiotic combinations, and in pooled hospital sink water spiked with target analytes. By tolerating non-orthogonal, cross-reactive, and indirect responses, distributed dynamic sensing broadens the range of biological systems usable for multiplexed measurement, wherever input combinations produce reproducible, distinguishable response trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.