Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42471320›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Engineering microbial consortia for distributed signal processing.

Katherine E Duncker, Ashwini R Shende, Irida Shyti, Ashley Ruan, Ryan D'Cunha, Harshitha Venugopal-Lavanya, Helena R Ma, Sizhe Liu, Neil Gottel, Deverick J Anderson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katherine E DunckerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4585-5507
Ashwini R ShendeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Irida ShytiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ashley RuanDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ryan D'CunhaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Harshitha Venugopal-LavanyaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Helena R MaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-7948
Sizhe LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0584-8286
Neil GottelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6568-5675
Deverick J AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Claudia GunschDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lingchong YouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. you@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-4007

Funding

Post-antibiotic effect and design of optimal antibiotic dosing protocolsR01GM098642 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YOU, LINGCHONG · 2011 to 2025
$3.6M
Targeted control of self-transmissible plasmids by using engineered interfering plasmidsR01EB031869 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YOU, LINGCHONG · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031869NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098642U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R01EB031869U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R01GM098642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central goal in biology is to infer input signals from measurable readouts. Engineered biosensors are usually built to respond selectively to single inputs, so crosstalk between sensors must be removed through laborious, context-specific orthogonalization. Here we show that multiplexed concentrations can be inferred without eliminating crosstalk. We distribute sensing across a microbial community and decode its time-resolved collective response, which can disambiguate combinations of chemical inputs even when individual sensors show crosstalk or respond indirectly. A computational framework coupling kinetic modeling with machine learning maps these community dynamics to input concentrations. We demonstrate quantitative inference in communities with low or high sensor crosstalk, in communities that respond only indirectly to antibiotic combinations, and in pooled hospital sink water spiked with target analytes. By tolerating non-orthogonal, cross-reactive, and indirect responses, distributed dynamic sensing broadens the range of biological systems usable for multiplexed measurement, wherever input combinations produce reproducible, distinguishable response trajectories.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMicrobial ConsortiaSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAnti-Bacterial AgentsKineticsMachine LearningAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID42471320
PMCPMC13493982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.