ArticleAcademic pediatrics
Evaluation of Pharmacist Perceptions and Practices Regarding Dispensing Oral Liquid Medications.
Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveStudies have demonstrated that using milliliters (mL)-only in dosing instructions and on dosing devices for oral liquid medications (OLMs) can prevent patient/caregiver dosing errors. While previous studies have assessed the perceptions/practices of primary care providers (PCPs) regarding dosing units for OLMs, perceptions/practices of community-based pharmacists are not well described.
methodsData were collected in June 2024, through an online survey of retail pharmacists. Pharmacist perceptions/practices regarding OLMs were calculated overall and stratified by the number of years practicing pharmacy. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between certain characteristics and perceptions on pharmacist dispensing behaviors.
resultsA total of 201 pharmacists completed the survey. Pharmacists who had been practicing for <10 years were more likely to think that mL-only was safest to use in dosing instructions for OLMs (88.9%) and that patients/caregivers prefer dosing instructions in mL-only (73.3%) compared to those who had been practicing for ≥10 years (70.5% and 37.2%, respectively). Only one-third (33.8%) of all pharmacists reported that they would convert the dosing units dispensed on a prescription for oral liquid amoxicillin to mL-only if the prescriber wrote the dosing instructions in teaspoons; with pharmacist perception that mL-only was the safest to use in dosing instructions having the most significant impact on this dispensing behavior (adjusted odds ratio 11.37, 95% confidence interval 3.20-40.44).
conclusionsEducational efforts promoting the importance of using mL-only units on dosing instructions/devices for OLMs for pharmacists and PCPs may be necessary to promote safe dosing practices and reduce pediatric medication errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.