ArticleCognition2026
Processing negation may demonstrate compositionality in rhesus macaques.
Article in Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compositionality, the ability to flexibly combine meaningful words into higher-level representations, is a critical feature of human language. However, the evolutionary origins of compositional processing are unclear, and evidence for this ability in nonhuman primates is largely lacking. Compositionality is inherent in processing negative clauses, such as 'not red'. Here, we conducted a series of three experiments using a novel, nonlinguistic 'negation' paradigm, which provide evidence of compositional processing in nonhuman primates. Macaques learned to associate an abstract visual stimulus with the process of negation (i.e., 'not'), and to combine this compositionally with novel images (e.g., a dog) on a trial-by-trial basis (i.e., to select a stimulus that was not a dog). Our results suggest compositional processing in monkeys, raising the possibility that the core of this language-critical ability may be present in monkeys, and thus may not be unique to humans or to language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.