ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2026
Machine learning-driven risk prediction for post-hospitalization diabetes case management: Integrating clinical and social determinants of health.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePatients hospitalized for diabetes-related conditions face elevated risks of emergency department (ED) visits post-discharge, driven by both clinical factors and social determinants of health (SDoH). This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models integrating clinical and SDoH data to identify high-risk patients for post-hospitalization diabetes case management.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, including 162,063 inpatient encounters (January 2020-June 2024) for training and testing and 16,164 encounters (January-May 2025) for temporal validation. Patients were identified by diabetes-related ICD-10 codes or HbA1c ≥ 6.5 %, reflecting the scope of the institution's diabetes case management program. Predictors included demographics, diabetes-related comorbidities, surgical procedures, laboratory values, medications, and both area-level and individual-level SDoH. Logistic regression, decision trees, and XGBoost models were developed to predict diabetes-related ED visits within 3 months post-hospitalization. Hyperparameters for decision tree and XGBoost models were tuned via 10-fold cross-validation, and calibration was assessed using Brier scores and calibration plots.
resultsAmong 162,063 hospitalizations, 6.2 % resulted in a diabetes-related ED visit. XGBoost achieved the best performance (area under the curve [AUC] 0.846, precision 0.420, sensitivity 0.296, specificity 0.972), maintained on temporal validation (AUC 0.842). Key predictors included past ED visit frequency, insulin prescriptions, age, and area-level SDoH indices. Individual-level SDoH factors, including home safety issues and work disability, also contributed to prediction. Targeting the top 20 % of predicted risk captured 64.1 % of all ED visits. Model discrimination was consistent across racial subgroups (AUC range: 0.843-0.851). Calibration was clinically acceptable across datasets.
conclusionsIntegration of clinical and SDoH data achieved effective prediction of post-hospitalization ED visits. XGBoost provided excellent discrimination with temporal stability. Decision trees offered greater interpretability. A pilot implementation delivering daily risk-stratified patient lists to the diabetes case manager is underway, demonstrating a practical pathway from model development to clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.