ArticleBiomaterials advances2026
Systematic engineering of Layer-by-Layer anti-miR coated wound dressings with tunable release kinetics.
Article in Biomaterials advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Layer-by-Layer (LbL) technique enables conformal coating of commercial wound dressings with oligonucleotide therapeutics and polymeric excipients to achieve controlled delivery to non-healing wounds. We previously demonstrated a proof-of-concept LbL dressing containing miRNA inhibitors (anti-miRs); however, release occurred on a single time scale. Because wound healing is dynamic, temporally tuning anti-miR delivery to the wound may alter therapeutic effects. Here, we provide an approach to modulate oligonucleotide release kinetics from coated wound dressings, exploring the design space of excipients, formulation parameters, and oligonucleotide structure. Incorporation of Laponite nanoclay prolonged release, while poly(acrylic acid) accelerated release kinetics. Hydrolyzable poly(β-amino esters) with varying hydrolysis rates were also used to further tune release kinetics. A fast-release formulation demonstrated 40% release over 4 h, while a slow-release formulation took 24 h to release the same amount. We evaluated these dressings in an excisional chronic wound model in diabetic (db/db) mice using anti-miR-92a (92ai), selected for its ability to enhance angiogenic signaling and promote wound closure. Dressings coated with 92ai accelerated healing compared to non-targeting scramble anti-miR (Scr) controls, with closure rates accelerated at times corresponding to release kinetics. Although ultimate wound closure was similar across release conditions, analyses of gene expression, cellular composition, histology, and immunofluorescence suggested distinct underlying mechanisms. Differences were particularly evident in macrophage phenotype and angiogenesis, suggesting that release timing influences biological pathways active during repair. Overall, these findings demonstrate that LbL dressings can be engineered for temporally controlled oligonucleotide delivery and that release kinetics may shape mechanisms driving wound closure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.