ArticleJournal of biomechanics2026
Viscoelastic recovery time of chondrocytes from monolayer and alginate cultures.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study uses a 3D-printed variable-height flow cellto investigate the viscoelastic properties of in vitro cultured chondrocytes that have synthesized an endogenous neomatrix surrounding the cells. It was hypothesized that chondrocytes could be distinguished by phenotype associated with their culture environment using viscoelastic recovery time, owing to variation in the pericellular matrix (PCM) produced by chondrocytes from different culture methods. The chondrocyte plasma membrane was imaged with confocal microscopy during applied deformation and subsequent recovery. The projected cell area was fitted with a Burgers mechanical model to extract the viscoelastic recovery time. No difference in recovery time between bovine and primary OA cells from monolayer or neotissue-rich alginate cultures was observed. However, a statistically significant difference in recovery time was observed between cells from monolayer and alginate cultures in both the bovine (31 s vs. 13 s) and primary OA (34 s vs. 13 s) groups. This work shows that viscoelastic recovery time is influenced by the culture method used for chondrocytes and further demonstrates the role of the chondrocyte-secreted neotissue as amechanical protector of chondrocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42470733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.