ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Insecure Attachment to God and Perceived Wellness at a US Private University.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attachment theory suggests that infants seek proximity to an attachment figure in times of physical or emotional threat, aiming for security and emotional support. Recent research has applied this model to understanding individuals' relationships with the divine. In multiple religions, God is viewed as a personal being who provides support, protection, and unconditional love, making him the ultimate attachment figure. Previous research has linked attachment to God with health risks and negative coping outcomes; however, little is known about how attachment to God can affect perceptions of healthy, psychological well-being. The current study included 986 undergraduate students (response rate 38%) from a private Christian liberal arts university in Southern California. The study examined how insecure attachment to God influences psychological well-being. Participants completed surveys assessing attachment to God and perceived wellness across multiple dimensions. Correlation analyses indicated that a secure attachment style was significantly positively associated with well-being, while insecure attachment styles were significantly inversely related to well-being. Furthermore, hierarchical regressions, adjusting for demographic factors, revealed that anxious and insecure-avoidant attachment styles predicted lower overall well-being and subtypes of well-being, accounting for variance ranging from 3 to 20%. Notably, anxious attachment styles were the strongest predictors of diminished well-being. These findings underscore the importance of understanding attachment to God in promoting psychological well-being, shedding light on avenues for further research and interventions to enhance individuals' attachment to the divine and overall well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42470612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.