Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42470604›Full record

ReviewApplied health economics and health policy2026

A Review of the Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with Older People Across Care Settings.

Kiri Lay, Jenny Cleland, Jyoti Khadka, Rachel Milte, Julie Ratcliffe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiri LayHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. kiri.lay@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-3771
Jenny ClelandHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-8015
Jyoti KhadkaHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1012-2119
Rachel MilteHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7533-6260
Julie RatcliffeHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7365-1988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global population ageing continues to place pressure on health and care systems. In Australia, the increasing integration of health and aged care systems is a rising policy approach to alleviating the burden on the health system and improving the quality of care for older people. Preference-based instruments (PBMs) have become increasingly important as a tool to enable quality assessment and economic evaluation of both health and aged care services. Given the changing policy context towards more integrated services and older peoples' frequent movement across both health and aged care settings, it is important that PBMs are applicable across different care settings. This literature review aimed to assess the application of generic PBMs with older people across health and aged care settings. A systematic search of three databases for studies utilising PBMs with older people in health or aged care settings resulted in 204 articles included for review. The EQ-5D instruments were the most frequently utilised instrument across studies, followed by the Quality of Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC). Most instruments were applied in either health or aged care settings, with few being used across both. The measurement of quality of life in older people across these settings using PBMs requires consideration of several issues particularly pertinent to this population, including the appropriateness, relevance and comprehensiveness of dimensions, the use of a suitable recall period and enabling self-report for people with cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedPatient PreferenceAgedAustraliaHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42470604
PMCPMC13498616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.