ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Long-term effects of glyphosate on substrates with varying organic matter content: an ecotoxicological assessment under laboratory conditions.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the time required for glyphosate and its primary decomposition product, AMPA, to degrade in substrates with varying organic matter content, and to identify when the toxic effects of these substances diminish due to decomposition in the tested substrates. Additionally, the study investigated how nitrogen and phosphorus levels change during the decomposition of glyphosate and AMPA in relation to the organic matter content of the substrates. Ecotoxicological assessments were conducted using biotests (Phytotoxkit, Lemna, and Microtox). Chemical analyses of substrates with different organic matter contents were performed to measure glyphosate and AMPA levels, as well as various forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. The experiments were carried out under laboratory conditions over a time course from 0 to 24 months after herbicide application. It has been shown that sand is the substrate in which glyphosate and AMPA degrade most slowly (up to 24 months). The presence of undegraded glyphosate and AMPA in sand resulted in the longest-lasting toxic effects on test organisms in the bioassays conducted with this substrate. In agricultural soil, however, undecomposed glyphosate and AMPA had a toxic effect on the studied organisms only for a short period after the herbicide was applied, due to the rapid degradation of glyphosate and AMPA (3 months). There was an increase in the levels of phosphorus and nitrogen in the substrates after the herbicide was added, compared to the control. Although the experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions, the observed increase in nitrogen and phosphorus content in the tested substrates following the degradation of glyphosate and AMPA suggests that there may be potential implications for processes in the natural environment. This could be particularly relevant in areas where high doses of glyphosate have been used over many years. Additionally, it appears that in substrates with lower organic matter content, the degradation of glyphosate and AMPA might take longer, potentially leading to a more extended toxic effect on living organisms compared to substrates with higher organic matter. These observations could, in some cases, contribute to the development of increased tolerance to glyphosate in plants from such areas. However, further studies would be necessary to fully understand these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.