Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42470582›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Alcohol Use and Operational Readiness in the U.S. Active-duty Military: A Review of Burden, Culture, and Barriers to Care.

Rebecca Lobach, Rohul Amin, Sarah Maggio, Kathleen Huber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca Lobach, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Rohul AminDepartment of Psychiatry and Medicine, USUHS, PO Box 88, Dayton, MD, 21036, USA. rohul.amin@usuhs.edu.
Sarah MaggioDepartment of Psychiatry, USUHS Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kathleen HuberDepartment of Psychiatry, USUHS Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines alcohol use among U.S. military personnel, including patterns of use across the full spectrum of consumption, including behaviors not meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for alcohol use disorder. It examines the prevalence and aspects of military life, culture, and context that may serve as important contributors to and risk factors for developing unhealthy, excessive, or disordered alcohol use. This review discusses efforts towards prevention, interventions, and policies pertaining to alcohol use in the military and identifies areas that would benefit from future research. Alcohol use remains a critical determinant of military health, operational readiness, and force lethality. While the Department of War (DoW) has invested in developing a modern framework for harm reduction, rates of binge and heavy drinking in the military continue to exceed that of civilians. Unique challenges of military life, including operational and institutional stressors, stigma and barriers to care, and factors of military social culture and context, coalesce to normalize and sustain unhealthy alcohol consumption within the force. Future efforts must focus on evaluating current interventions and tailoring evidence-based programs to address the needs of a diverse military population.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholismHealth Services AccessibilityMilitary PersonnelHumansUnited StatesAlcohol UseMental HealthMilitary CultureMilitary PersonnelOperational Readiness

Identifiers

PMID42470582
PMCPMC13380565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.