ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Implementation of State Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Mandatory Checking Requirements and Prescribed Opioid Analgesic Use Among Women With and Without HIV in The Women's Interagency HIV Study: A Longitudinal Observational Study Using Staggered Adoption Difference-in-differences Analyses.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implementation of prescription drug monitoring programs requiring mandatory checking when prescribing or dispensing reduces opioid analgesic (OA) prescribing. OA receipt varies by individual-level factors, including HIV status. Mandatory prescription drug monitoring program checking requirements (MPDMPs) may exacerbate inequities if prompts trigger biased decision-making around clinical need for OAs. We examined whether MPDMP implementation was associated with changes in self-reported use of prescribed OAs among women and whether associations varied by HIV status. We conducted staggered adoption difference-in-differences analyses using 11 semi-annual data waves (2014-2019) from the Women's Interagency HIV Study, a multisite observational cohort of women with and without HIV. Among 1,720 women, 71% had HIV; 61% were non-Hispanic Black. €The percentage of participants reporting prescribed OA use at baseline was comparable for women with HIV (16.5%) and without HIV (15.1%) but varied by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white 22.9%; non-Hispanic Black 13.6%; Hispanic 14.1%). In the adjusted model controlling for baseline age, race/ethnicity, education, HIV status, and census tract socioeconomic characteristics, MPDMP implementation was associated with a 3.6% percentage-point reduction in the probability prescribed OA use (average treatment effect on the treated = -0.036, 95% confidence interval - 0.060 to - 0.011). There was no significant evidence of variation by HIV status. MPDMPs reduce prescribed OA use in individuals. MPDMP implementation raises important questions about the role of provider bias in balancing reductions in overprescribing with maintaining access to OAs for those with special medical needs. Future research examining subgroups is needed to fully characterize MPDMP benefits and harms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42470564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.