ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Patient satisfaction and perioperative data after breast surgery in tumescent local anaesthesia.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTumescent local anaesthesia (TLA) is an upcoming alternative to general anaesthesia. No data exists regarding patient satisfaction, necessary volume of TLA, frequency of supplementary analgosedation, and associated complication rate after different kinds of breast surgeries in TLA.
methodsIn this retrospective study 104 patients, who underwent breast surgery in TLA between 1/2022 and 1/2023, answered a questionnaire. Patients were categorized according to histology and surgical complexity into two groups: those with benign histology undergoing minor procedures (outpatients) and those with malignant histology undergoing more complex surgical procedures (inpatients). Perioperative data was retrieved from the patients' files.
results96.1% of all patients were (very) satisfied with the surgery, with inpatients being significantly more satisfied (p = 0.022). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding perception of TLA-infiltration, likelihood of recommending the procedure in TLA, or willingness to undergo the procedure again in TLA. Six patients (5.8%) had postoperative complications with no significant difference in frequency of complications. Outpatients needed significantly less TLA-volume (184.7ml ± 131.4 ml), compared to inpatients with a total TLA-volume of 473.3 ml ± 205.2 ml (p < 0.001). 25 patients (24.0%) opted for an intraoperative midazolam sedation (mean 1.5 mg, SD 0.9mg), predominantly in more extensive procedures.
conclusionPatients' high satisfaction and recommendation level and the low rate of complications are convincing reasons to offer TLA as an alternative to general anaesthesia for a large spectrum of breast surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.