SynthesisRheumatology international2026
Favorable clinical outcomes of biologic and targeted therapies in refractory eosinophilic fasciitis: a case-based systematic review.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by fascial inflammation, skin induration, eosinophilia, and progressive functional impairment. Although glucocorticosteroids (GCs) remain the first-line therapy, some patients develop refractory or steroid-dependent disease, highlighting the need for alternative treatment strategies. This case-based review summarizes current evidence on biologic and targeted therapies in severe EF and presents a case of successful treatment with tocilizumab (TCZ). A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified 35 eligible articles published between 2008 and 2026. Qualitative synthesis included 49 patients treated with biologic or targeted agents, most commonly rituximab (n = 14), tocilizumab (n = 9), infliximab (n = 7), and mepolizumab (n = 5). Partial or complete response was achieved in 47 of 49 (96%) patients across all treatment groups. Biologic therapy was associated with a pronounced steroid-sparing effect, enabling GCs dose reduction or complete withdrawal in the majority of refractory patients. Furthermore, we describe a 28-year-old man with progressive, treatment-resistant EF who failed to respond adequately to GCs and methotrexate. Following initiation of weekly subcutaneous TCZ, the patient showed marked clinical, laboratory, and radiological improvement, with normalization of inflammatory markers, regression of fascial edema on MRI, and substantial functional recovery. Available case-based evidence suggests that biologic and targeted therapies, including IL-6 inhibition, may be promising options in selected patients with severe, refractory, or GC-dependent EF. However, considering the high risk of publication bias and reliance on case reports, prospective multicenter studies are required to establish standardized treatment recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42470457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.