ArticleDysphagia2026
When "Sarcopenic Dysphagia" Is Not the Answer.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An older woman in her late 70s was referred for swallowing assessment because of recurrent aspiration pneumonia, weight loss, low body mass index, reduced handgrip strength, and slow gait speed, initially suggesting sarcopenic dysphagia. However, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopic swallowing study demonstrated marked delay in swallow initiation, impaired airway protective reflexes, and reduced pharyngeal sensation despite the absence of substantial pharyngeal residue and relatively preserved upper esophageal sphincter opening. Careful reassessment of the videofluoroscopic study revealed abnormal craniovertebral alignment. Subsequent computed tomography demonstrated atlantoaxial dislocation with superior migration of the odontoid process, and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed compression of the medulla oblongata. This case highlights the importance of avoiding oversimplified attribution of dysphagia to sarcopenia and of reconsidering alternative neural or structural mechanisms when observed swallowing physiology is discordant with the presumed diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42470443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.