ArticleJACC. Asia2026
Radial Wall Strain for Predicting Severe Dissection After Drug-Coated Balloon.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Angiographic Radial Wall Strain: Plaque Vulnerability or Procedural Dissection Risk?JACC. Asia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough drug-coated balloons (DCBs) demonstrate efficacy in de novo coronary artery disease, patients with non-small vessel lesions (NSVLs, ≥2.75 mm) face elevated risks of rescue stenting due to procedure-related coronary dissection. Radial wall stress maximum (RWS
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of RWS
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 194 patients with de novo NSVL who were evaluated for DCB angioplasty. Dissections were classified via National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria: nonsevere (no dissection or Type A/B) vs severe (Type C-F). RWS
resultsSevere dissections occurred in 32.0% (62 of 194), predominantly Type C (83.9%, 52 of 62). RWS
conclusionsRWS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.