Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42470374›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2026

Inclusion Complexation of Native and Functionalized α-, β-, and γ-Cyclodextrins with PFAS: An Experimental and Molecular Simulation Study.

Bowen Sha, Akhilesh Soodan, Kim Maren Lompe, Gokhan Barin, Thijs J H Vlugt, Loukas D Peristeras, Othonas A Moultos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bowen ShaEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, Delft2628 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-3144-1543
Akhilesh SoodanSanitary Engineering, Water Management Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft2628 CN, The Netherlands.
Kim Maren LompeSanitary Engineering, Water Management Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft2628 CN, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8350-1702
Gokhan BarinCyclopure, Inc. , Evanston, Illinois60201, United States.
Thijs J H VlugtEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, Delft2628 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-8712
Loukas D PeristerasMolecular Thermodynamics and Modeling of Materials Laboratory, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Aghia Paraskevi, AttikisGR-15310, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3741-4077
Othonas A MoultosEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, Delft2628 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-9684

Funding

Cyclopure Inc NAExacte en Natuurwetenschappen 20023Waternet NAWitteveen+Bos NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

β-Cyclodextrin (β-CD)-based polymers have shown high adsorption capacities for removing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from drinking water. PFAS capture by these materials involves many physical and chemical processes, such as adsorption and inclusion complexation. Quantifying the underlying host-guest binding between CDs and PFAS nevertheless remains essential because it governs the primary inclusion step. Here, we investigated native and linker-modified CD-PFAS inclusion complexes in aqueous solution using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the attach-pull-release (APR) method. We computed the Gibbs free energies of binding for α-, β-, and γ-CDs with seven linear PFAS, including perfluorocarboxylic acids and perfluorosulfonic acids, and found reasonable agreement with our experimental measurements and previously reported data. Comparison between implicit and explicit solvent calculations suggests that the apparently better agreement of the implicit solvent model for some native monomer complexes is likely due to error cancellation rather than a more transferable physical description, whereas explicit solvent is required to capture solvent-related salt and linker effects. Overall, β-CD exhibited the strongest binding affinities, whereas α-CD showed negligible affinities and γ-CD bound PFAS more weakly than β-CD. Hydrogen bonding, interaction-energy decomposition, and solvent-accessible surface area showed that host-guest hydrogen bonding cannot uniquely predict affinities, and that hydrophobic dehydration plays a dominant role in binding. We further examined how background ion concentration affects β-CD-PFAS binding and found that explicit solvent simulations capture a clear salt dependence, with Li/Merz ion parameters describing the high-salinity trend more reasonably than the Joung-Cheatham model. To mimic the local microenvironment surrounding CD units in polymers, we also examined three linker-modified β-CD models containing phenyl groups. Bind3P water correctly reproduced the experimentally reported enhancement of PFAS adsorption with increasing linker number, and energy decomposition showed that linker groups strengthen PFAS binding by enhancing local hydrophobic confinement and specific linker-guest interactions. Overall, this combined experimental and computational study provides molecular-level insight into the building blocks of cyclodextrin polymers and lays the groundwork for future in silico construction of CD polymer models for PFAS adsorption under diverse water-matrix conditions.

Identifiers

PMID42470374
PMCPMC13430634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.