ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Mixed Methods Trajectory Analysis of Daily Educational and Social Experiences of Youth With Cancer From Diagnosis to Early Survivorship.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundYouth with cancer may face acute and long-term academic and social challenges. Most existing research has relied on cross-sectional or single-informant methods to describe these challenges. This longitudinal, convergent mixed-methods study aimed to characterize academic and social challenges faced by youth with cancer, from the perspective of youth, caregivers, and educators-from onset of diagnosis into survivorship.
methodsSeventy-five triads of youth (M
resultsSignificant disruptions were observed at T1, which mostly improved over time (p < 0.001). Academic and social concerns persisted for those with brain tumors or who were female. Caregivers and educators consistently expressed concern about long-term academic impact, while youth showed decreasing concern compared to caregivers and educators (b = 0.61, SE = 0.26, p = 0.02 and b = 0.76, SE = 0.31, p = 0.02). Qualitative responses generally suggested more difficulties than questionnaire data and provided additional context.
conclusionsResults affirm the importance of ongoing needs assessment for youth with cancer through multiple methods. Findings also may inform tailored psychosocial and educational interventions to enhance the quality of life for youth affected by cancer and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.