ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Machine Learning-Derived Neural Signatures of Itch and Pain That Reliably Distinguish the Two Sensations in Humans: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent advances in human neuroimaging combined with machine learning have enabled identification of neural signatures representing various internal states, providing a promising framework for developing objective biomarkers. However, no study has investigated neural signatures that can reliably identify and distinguish itch and pain. Such neural signatures were explored in the present study using functional MRI (fMRI) and support vector machine (SVM).
methodsWe measured brain activity in 33 healthy participants under cowhage-induced itch, mustard oil-induced pain, and control conditions using fMRI. We made seed-based functional connectivity images (R-images), where seed brain regions were the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and bilateral anterior insular cortex (aIC). We conducted a cross-validated and bootstrapped SVM using R-images to identify key brain regions with weights that were important to identify and distinguish itch and pain (threshold to identify these regions: p < 0.05). These neural signatures of itch and pain were applied to test sets of R-images to examine classification performance (Itch vs. Control or Pain).
resultsThese signatures showed excellent classification capability, in particular when combining multiple signatures (area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve: > 0.9, accuracy: > 90%).
conclusionsThis is the first neuroimaging study to explore neural signatures that can reliably detect and distinguish itch and pain using machine learning. Our approach using seed-based functional connectivity images combined with cross-validated and bootstrapped SVM demonstrated high classification performance. The present study serves as a proof-of-concept demonstrating the feasibility of this approach to develop brain-based biomarkers for assessing itch and pain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This is the first study to identify neural signatures of itch and pain. These signatures reveal distinct brain network patterns representing itch and pain, enabling reliable detection and differentiation of these two sensations based on brain activity. These signatures hold strong potential for the development of objective assessments of itch and pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.