ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Brain Clearance of Contrast Agent in Intravenous DCE-MRI Is Measurable and Cannot Be Explained by Clearance Across the BBB Alone.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain Clearance of Contrast Agent in Intravenous DCE-MRI Is Measurable and Cannot Be Explained by Clearance Across the BBB Alone.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the feasibility of measuring brain clearance of gadolinium contrast agent using standard intravenous DCE-MRI acquisitions and evaluate the contribution of blood-brain barrier (BBB) and non-BBB clearance routes.
methodsUptake and extended Tofts models were fit to DCE-MRI data from people with Parkinson's disease, post-stroke and controls. Models were compared using the Akaike information criterion. Key parameters (K
resultsThe extended Tofts model provided a superior fit compared to all uptake-only models. Extended Tofts estimates of the extravascular extracellular volume fraction v
conclusionModeling clearance of extravasated contrast agent from the brain improves fit quality compared to models that neglect clearance. Estimates of interstitial volume fraction were underestimated at low K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.