ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Resource use by threatened, native Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the presence of two non-native salmonids.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction of non-native species contributes to the global decline of freshwater fishes by disrupting the diet and resources of native species through competition. Despite the potential for non-native trout (Family: Salmonidae) to compete with native trout, non-native trout species have been widely introduced worldwide to support recreational fishing. In this study, we examined resource use by native Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus), a Threatened species, and non-native Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) in headwater streams in Alberta, Canada. Our objective was to investigate potential for competition and its implications for Bull Trout populations. To assess changes in diet, we used stable isotope analysis. Brook Trout and Brown Trout had higher trophic positions (3.49 ± 0.02 and 3.53 ± 0.02) and greater proportions of terrestrial resources in their diets (0.53 ± 0.02, 0.54 ± 0.03) than Bull Trout (TP = 3.38 ± 0.02, proportion terrestrial = 0.36 ± 0.02), suggesting the non-native species may outcompete Bull Trout for preferred resources and larger prey. Moreover, a relatively wide isotopic niche of Bull Trout led to a lack of niche partitioning and substantial overlap in niche utilization between sympatric Brook Trout and Bull Trout, supporting the potential for future niche displacement, particularly in scenarios where resources are scarce. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring and managing the invasion of non-native salmonids in streams where native salmonid populations exist, and the challenges in understanding multi-species interactions in dynamic habitats. It highlights the need for effective fisheries management and conservation efforts in regions where native freshwater fishes are facing population declines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.