ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Mixed Methods Studies Examining the Physical Activity Practices Among African American and Black Women: Protocol for a Methodological Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfrican American and Black women are among the least physically active demographic groups in the United States and experience disproportionate burdens of chronic disease that may be reduced through regular physical activity (PA). Mixed methods research is increasingly used to examine the behavioral, social, and contextual factors that influence PA in this population.
objectiveThis study aims to identify, examine, and describe the mixed methods designs used in research on PA practices among African American and Black women in the United States; compare methodological approaches; identify gaps in the literature; and provide recommendations for future research.
methodsThis scoping review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A 3-step search strategy was developed and peer reviewed using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies guideline. Seven databases will be searched: Academic Search Ultimate, Agricultural and Environmental Science Database, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Ultimate, PubMed, SocINDEX, and SPORTDiscus. Eligible studies will be primary mixed methods investigations involving non-Hispanic African American or Black women aged ≥18 years residing in the United States. Studies must include both quantitative and qualitative components with evidence of integration. Records will be deduplicated and screened in Rayyan according to population, concept, and context eligibility criteria. Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics, tables, and an evidence map. The review will be limited to English-language studies published from February 1, 2011, through February 18, 2026.
resultsThe protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework. The search strategy was piloted, refined, and finalized on February 18, 2026. Database searching has been completed, records have been imported and deduplicated, and screening is currently ongoing. Data extraction and synthesis have not yet commenced. Completion of study selection, data charting, and synthesis is anticipated by August 2026, with submission of the completed scoping review planned thereafter.
conclusionsThis review will provide a methodological map of mixed methods studies examining PA among African American and Black women, including design types, integration strategies, timing, prioritization, use of joint displays, and reporting practices. Findings will inform future mixed methods research and support the development of more rigorous and transparent investigations in this field.
trial registrationOpen Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/NA9ME; https://osf.io/na9me/overview. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/93012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.