Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42470168›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2026

From Aspiration to Admission: Understanding Pre-Medical Student Perceptions and Decision-Making Processes.

L Canthiya, M Wang, A Bouriayee, R Qamar, A Acai, Preti Btb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L CanthiyaSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4234-8680
M WangPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A BouriayeeUniversity of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
R QamarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
A AcaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-2946
Preti BtbDepartment of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-417X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe medical school application process is demanding, with several factors contributing to burnout. Existing literature highlights pre-medical students' perceptions about what is required for admissions success. These perceptions can drive extreme behaviours; however, program-level evidence shows such steps may not always be necessary or desired. This discrepancy underscores the need to explore the origins of these perceptions, improve guidance, reduce burnout, and promote a balanced pre-medical experience.

methodsThis generic qualitative study, informed by a constructive orientation, used reflexive thematic analysis. Twelve pre-medical students were recruited through online forum posts and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews explored how participants constructed perceptions of admissions success and how this informed decision making. Analysis involved regular reflexive team discussions.

findingsFour themes were developed: a) Formal and informal influences shape pre-medical students' perceptions and interpretations of the application process; b) Early, performative strategizing is used to navigate the perceived competitive system; c) Trial, adaptation and reflection occur iteratively to reflect an ideal medical student 'archetype,' and d) The medical school application process elicits tensions between authenticity and 'what the system wants.'

conclusionFindings suggest that pre-medical students construct perceptions of admissions success through an iterative process of information gathering, reflection and adaptation. These perceptions contribute to the development of an 'ideal' applicant archetype that shapes strategic self-presentation and tensions between authenticity and perceived admissions expectations. Our findings highlight a need for more transparent outreach opportunities between the medical community and pre-medical students to avoid echo chambers and reduce inauthenticity and burnout.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSchool Admission CriteriaStudents, PremedicalFemaleHumansMalePerceptionQualitative Researchpregnancy discrimination spillover–crossoversocial‐cognitive career theorywork self‐efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42470168
PMCPMC13379721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.