ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Dynamical-nonequilibrium alanine scanning for identifying allosteric positions in proteins.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allosteric effects are widespread in proteins, but predicting the impact of sequence substitutions at positions distant from ligand-binding or enzyme active sites remains challenging, as their effects are mediated through complex dynamical networks. Pinpointing such positions experimentally is labor intensive and low throughput. Equilibrium molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are useful: analysis methods can identify functional distal sites and networks, while free energy simulations can predict effects on stability or binding, given sufficient sampling; such simulations are typically time-consuming, requiring extensive simulation of each individual mutant. Here, we introduce a dynamical-nonequilibrium MD (D-NEMD) protocol using alanine substitutions as targeted perturbations to identify distal positions that influence enzyme function. Using the well characterized class A β-lactamase KPC-2 as a test system, we show that D-NEMD distinguishes functional from nonfunctional sites based on whether substitutions generate structured, long-range responses that reach the active site. KPC-2 is clinically important due to its broad substrate spectrum and the emergence of resistance-associated point mutations, many of which act through nonlocal effects on catalytic residues. Alanine substitutions at positions 179 and 164, which disrupt the Ω-loop salt bridge, trigger persistent structural responses propagating through the protein and reach both catalytic residues and the oxyanion hole backbone. Likewise, alanine substitution at position 220 elicits pronounced responses extending to the active-site β sheet and key loops, consistent with its known role in substrate specificity. In contrast, substitution at position 276-mutations of which have negligible kinetic impact-produces only local displacements with minimal propagation and no effect on catalytically relevant regions. These differential response patterns align with experimentally observed resistance phenotypes. D-NEMD therefore provides a fast, generalizable, and predictive approach for identifying allosterically connected distal positions. The protocol complements equilibrium MD, is straightforward to implement, and offers a tractable route for prioritizing candidate sites for mechanistic study or future mutational scanning efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.