ReviewAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2026
Development and validation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for rheumatology training in Brazil: the Reuma-EPA project.
Review in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompetency-based medical education increasingly guides postgraduate training worldwide. However, rheumatology training in Brazil still lacks a nationally standardized framework to define and assess core professional activities. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) address this gap by translating competencies into observable clinical practice and supporting supervision, assessment, and progressive autonomy.
objectiveTo develop and validate a national EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil and to present the conceptual and practical foundations supporting competency-based assessment in the specialty.
methodsThe Reuma-EPA project was conducted by the Education Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology using a five-phase methodological approach: identification of core professional activities, drafting of preliminary EPAs, internal expert review, internal consistency analysis, and national validation through a two-round Delphi process. Rheumatology educators from accredited residency programs across Brazil evaluated each EPA for relevance, clarity, and suitability for independent execution at the end of training. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of responses rated as 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale.
resultsEleven EPAs were developed and validated, covering the full spectrum of rheumatology practice, including ethical and professional conduct, patient assessment, diagnostic reasoning, laboratory and imaging interpretation, outpatient and inpatient care, use of immunomodulatory therapies, procedural skills, patient safety, and education. Each EPA was mapped to supervision levels and developmental milestones, creating a comprehensive framework that integrates patient-safety considerations and suggested workplace-based assessment tools for Brazilian rheumatology training.
conclusionThe Reuma-EPA project establishes the first nationally validated EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil. By providing an actionable competency-based structure aligned with national regulatory standards, this initiative supports curricular harmonization, transparent assessment, and the progressive development of resident autonomy with patient safety as a central principle. This framework has the potential to strengthen rheumatology training nationally and may serve as a model for other specialties and healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.