Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469901›Full record

ReviewAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2026

Development and validation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for rheumatology training in Brazil: the Reuma-EPA project.

Claudia Diniz Lopes Marques, Carlos Augusto Ferreira de Andrade, Carolina Müller, Danielle Egypto, Elaine Lira Medeiros, Fabíola Brasil B Rodrigues, Jozelia Rêgo, Marcelo Pimenta, Maria José Pereira Vilar, Rina Dalva Neubarth and 5 more

Abstract readValidation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Claudia Diniz Lopes MarquesUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Recife, Brasil. claudia.reumatologia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-2621
Carlos Augusto Ferreira de AndradeEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca/ Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-4957
Carolina MüllerUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-0773
Danielle EgyptoUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-024X
Elaine Lira MedeirosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4320-4818
Fabíola Brasil B RodriguesCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Belém, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-4099
Jozelia RêgoUniversidade Federal de Goiás - UFG, Goiânia, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-1506
Marcelo PimentaHospital Geral de Goiânia Dr Alberto Rassi, Goiânia, GO, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8281-3317
Maria José Pereira VilarUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8765-8571
Rina Dalva NeubarthHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo -HSPE-SP, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0921-1723
Simone ApenzellerUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-4474
Sônia Maria A A Loduca LimaHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo -HSPE-SP, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1526-401X
Sueli CarneiroUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/ Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7515-2365
Wilton Ferreira S SantosEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-5112
José Eduardo MartinezFaculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde da PUC-SP, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-6822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompetency-based medical education increasingly guides postgraduate training worldwide. However, rheumatology training in Brazil still lacks a nationally standardized framework to define and assess core professional activities. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) address this gap by translating competencies into observable clinical practice and supporting supervision, assessment, and progressive autonomy.

objectiveTo develop and validate a national EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil and to present the conceptual and practical foundations supporting competency-based assessment in the specialty.

methodsThe Reuma-EPA project was conducted by the Education Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology using a five-phase methodological approach: identification of core professional activities, drafting of preliminary EPAs, internal expert review, internal consistency analysis, and national validation through a two-round Delphi process. Rheumatology educators from accredited residency programs across Brazil evaluated each EPA for relevance, clarity, and suitability for independent execution at the end of training. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of responses rated as 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale.

resultsEleven EPAs were developed and validated, covering the full spectrum of rheumatology practice, including ethical and professional conduct, patient assessment, diagnostic reasoning, laboratory and imaging interpretation, outpatient and inpatient care, use of immunomodulatory therapies, procedural skills, patient safety, and education. Each EPA was mapped to supervision levels and developmental milestones, creating a comprehensive framework that integrates patient-safety considerations and suggested workplace-based assessment tools for Brazilian rheumatology training.

conclusionThe Reuma-EPA project establishes the first nationally validated EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil. By providing an actionable competency-based structure aligned with national regulatory standards, this initiative supports curricular harmonization, transparent assessment, and the progressive development of resident autonomy with patient safety as a central principle. This framework has the potential to strengthen rheumatology training nationally and may serve as a model for other specialties and healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationEducation, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyRheumatologyBrazilCurriculumDelphi TechniqueHumansCompetency-based medical educationDelphi studyMedical trainingRheumatology

Identifiers

PMID42469901
PMCPMC13660143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.