ReviewJournal of biological engineering2026
Smart colorimetric wound dressing for real-time infection detection and monitoring.
Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal Bioactive Approaches in Smart Dressings for Diabetic Foot Ulcers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound infection remains a major clinical challenge, leading to delayed healing, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare costs. Conventional wound dressings provide limited protection and lack the ability to offer real-time information on infection status, often resulting in delayed intervention and excessive antibiotic use. In response, smart wound dressings have been developed as responsive platforms that integrate sensing and therapeutic functions. This review summarizes recent advances in smart wound dressings with a focus on colorimetric, electrochemical, and fluorescence-based biosensing strategies incorporated into hydrogels, nanofibers, and stimuli-responsive polymeric matrices. Key mechanisms for infection detection, including pH variation, bacterial enzymes, metabolites, and reactive oxygen species, are discussed alongside representative material designs. The advantages and limitations of each sensing modality are critically compared, highlighting the simplicity and visual accessibility of colorimetric systems, the high sensitivity of electrochemical sensors, and the molecular specificity of fluorescence-based approaches. Despite significant progress, clinical translation remains limited by challenges related to long-term biocompatibility, scalable manufacturing, and regulatory validation. Future developments are expected to focus on multiplexed biosensing, integration with adaptive therapeutic release, and AI-assisted signal interpretation. Such next-generation theranostic wound dressings hold promise for enabling real-time infection monitoring, personalized treatment, and more effective wound management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.