ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Plasma proteomics and machine learning deliver non-invasive distinction between fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) manifests as fibrotic (FHP) and non-fibrotic (NFHP) phenotypes. Clinically distinguishing FHP from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains challenging owing to phenotypic overlap, despite divergent management protocols. This investigation sought to develop a plasma proteomics-based framework for differential diagnosis between these entities.
methodsA total of 119 subjects were enrolled from the Chinese Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) National Cohort and the PORTRAY IPF Cohort between July 2018 and June 2022, comprising 32 healthy controls (HCs), 31 NFHPs, 28 FHPs, and 28 IPF patients. The plasma samples were subject to quantitative proteomic profiling, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and bioinformatics analysis to identify differentially expressed proteins, core pathways, and co-expression modules. Key proteins were selected to construct and validate diagnostic models via seven machine learning algorithms.
resultsThis study delineated the plasma proteomic landscape of FHP and IPF, identifying 813 proteins. WGCNA revealed significant enrichment of the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and pyruvate metabolism pathways, implicating metabolic reprogramming in FHP pathogenesis. Differential analysis identified nine differentially expressed proteins, from which a six-protein signature (H2BC12, SHBG, APCS, PTPRG, IGHV1-58, and GAPDH) was derived through LASSO regression and recursive feature elimination. Among seven machine learning algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) achieved the optimal performance on the independent test set with an accuracy of 71.4%, effectively discriminating FHPs from IPFs. This model represents a promising non-invasive molecular tool for the differential diagnosis of atypical interstitial lung diseases.
conclusionsThis study established the plasma proteomic landscape of FHP, linking metabolic reprogramming to disease pathogenesis and providing a machine learning framework for biomarker-guided differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.