ArticleBMC health services research2026
Effects of refined management on medical quality, patient safety, and frontline staff's perceived competence and job satisfaction: a single-center retrospective study in a psychiatric hospital.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo retrospectively assess the comprehensive impact of transitioning from routine to refined quality management on medical quality, patient safety, and healthcare workers' perceived competence and satisfaction within the same medical team.
methodsA retrospective self‑controlled before‑and‑after study was conducted in a single psychiatric hospital. A stable cohort of 90 healthcare workers was followed through two periods: the control period (January-December 2024) with routine quality management, and the intervention period (January-December 2025) with refined quality management. Data were extracted from hospital information systems, quality management archives, and specialized databases. Outcome measures included medical quality scores as measured by internally developed scales, patient safety events measured as annual incidence rates using denominator data from hospital systems, and healthcare workers' self‑reported competence and satisfaction. Paired t‑tests were used for continuous scores, McNemar tests were applied for paired staff-level binary and ordinal data, while Pearson chi-square tests were used for patient safety incidence rates.
resultsCompared with the control period, the intervention period showed significant improvements across all domains. Scores for safety culture, management evaluation, and self‑assessed competence increased significantly (all P<0.001). All patient safety event rates decreased significantly (P<0.05), with adverse drug reactions and medical complaints showing the largest reductions (P<0.001). Overall satisfaction with the management model increased from 75.56% to 97.78% (P<0.001).
conclusionRefined quality management was associated with substantial improvements in healthcare workers' perceptions, self‑assessed competence, patient safety, and overall satisfaction in this psychiatric hospital setting. Although limited by its retrospective, single‑center design, these findings suggest that refined quality management may serve as a promising strategy for improving hospital outcomes. Further validation through multicenter prospective studies is warranted to confirm the generalizability and sustainability of these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.