ArticleMalaria journal2026
Detection of malaria infection from parasite-free blood smears.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria affects almost 263 million people worldwide, most of whom live in sub-Saharan countries. In a strategy to reduce malaria-related mortality and limit transmission, diagnosis in endemic areas needs to be immediately available on the field, easy to perform and cheap. Therefore, it currently heavily relies on microscopic examination of blood smears. However, several studies comparing the sensitivity of this approach with qPCR, considered as the most sensitive method albeit not available on the field, found that up to half of the infected population failed to be detected by microscopy alone because no visible parasites could be found in blood smears. These so-called submicroscopic infections pose a diagnostic challenge, yet represent a huge reservoir for malaria transmission. In this study, we hypothesized that qPCR results could be predicted by deep learning from subtle cell signals present in thin blood smear images, even in the absence of visible parasites, making a sensitive diagnostic directly available on the field using a microscope and a smartphone. To test this hypothesis, we acquired a large smartphone-based blood smear images dataset from samples tested both for microscopy and qPCR. We then focused exclusively on these "negative" slides from the microscopic diagnostic point of view, among which half were qPCR positive. A range of standard deep learning models were evaluated to best predict the qPCR result from these microscopy images, using various backbones along with various aggregation functions at the slide level, from a simple vote to Multiple Instance Learning with attention. Our results show that the qPCR results can be predicted from parasite free blood smear images with 62.0% (± 2.5 on 4-folds) accuracy and reaching 67.2% (± 9.6 on 4-folds) in sensitivity. We then used generative models to investigate the subtle morphological variations occurring in red blood cells that may contribute to predicting malaria infection in the absence of parasites. Leveraging thin blood smear and portable deep learning, we established the first proof of concept that the qPCR sensitivity can be approached through the detection of submicroscopic infections directly on the field without additional infrastructure and thus could significantly improve malaria surveillance and elimination efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.