Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469840›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2026

Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of Community Health Worker programmes in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Andrew Riley, Hannah Doughty, James Edward Hill, Clarissa Giebel, Matthew Harris, Nefyn H Williams

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew RileyDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. a.r.riley@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5569-8694
Hannah DoughtySchool of Psychology, Research Centre for Brain and Behaviour, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
James Edward HillSynthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS), University of Lancashire, Synthesis, Preston, UK.
Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Matthew HarrisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nefyn H WilliamsDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West Coast NIHR200182/ARCNWC161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal interest in Community Health Workers (CHWs) is rising as health systems seek to address persistent health inequities and the social determinants of health. However, in high-income countries (HICs), CHW implementation remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesises evidence on the factors that act as barriers and facilitators to the implementation and integration of CHW programmes across HIC primary healthcare settings.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies published between January 2001 and August 2025. Inclusion focused on qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods papers regarding CHW implementation in HICs. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data were synthesised using a 'Best Fit' Framework Synthesis and confidence in the findings was assessed via GRADE-CERQual.

resultsSeventy-two papers were included (US n = 64; UK n = 4; Australia n = 3; Belgium n = 1), primarily comprising qualitative and mixed methods designs. Key facilitators included leadership buy-in, the presence of implementation champions, and established community partnerships that enabled resource sharing. Prominent barriers included precarious, short-term funding models that prioritised quantitative outputs over relational labour; hierarchical medical power dynamics; and disconnected IT systems that necessitated redundant data entry. The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a catalyst, elevating the CHW role within public health infrastructure while simultaneously exposing digital divides and structural fragility. GRADE-CERQual ratings indicated high confidence in findings regarding funding sustainability, training, and integration.

conclusionsThe evidence synthesised in this review reveals a fundamental misalignment within current health services: while CHWs are valued for their unique relational capacity, they remain systemically undermined by transactional health system designs. Achieving sustainability requires a strategic shift toward long-term, flexible funding models and the workforce development of supportive infrastructure, including reflective supervision and standardised training. Integration must move beyond short-term, project-based initiatives toward a resilient and permanent public health workforce capable of addressing structural health inequities.

trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42022310789.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersDeveloped CountriesCOVID-19HumansPrimary Health CarePublic Health InfrastructureCommunity Health WorkersFramework synthesisHealth inequitiesHigh-income countriesImplementation sciencePrimary health careSocial determinants of healthSystematic reviewWorkforce development

Identifiers

PMID42469840
PMCPMC13660263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.