SynthesisBMC medical education2026
Fostering inclusion in healthcare: a systematic review of collaborative teaching with individuals with disorders of intellectual development.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhancing healthcare professionals' knowledge and skills through co-productive educational programs aligns with the UN's rights for people with disabilities. Collaborative teaching approaches, where individuals with Disorders of Intellectual Development participate as co-teachers, are increasingly recognized as effective strategies for improving healthcare training and fostering inclusion.
methodsThis review examines interventions involving individuals with Disorders of Intellectual Development as co-educators in higher education, focusing on studies published from 2009 to 2024. Inclusion criteria required: Co-teachers with Disorders of Intellectual Development, teaching in higher education, publications after 2009, university or medical school settings. Exclusion criteria eliminated studies without co-teachers with Disorders of Intellectual Development, those involving Disorders of Intellectual Development only as students or patients, and non-university settings. Literature searches were conducted across major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Psyndex, Web of Science, FIS Bildung, peDOCS, and Google Scholar), between April 25th and November 29th 2024, and articles were screened according to predefined criteria.
resultsOut of 21,327 records identified, 10 met the inclusion criteria, 2 articles were further included for additional consideration. In total, seven empirical studies, three literature reviews, one guideline and one case study were included. Most research focused on the impact of inclusive teaching on students, with some examining the qualification and participation processes for educators with Disorders of Intellectual Development. The evidence supports the value of co-teaching models involving individuals with Disorders of Intellectual Development, highlighting benefits for both students and co-teachers. However, the literature notes that systemic barriers and insufficient structural support can limit the effectiveness and sustainability of such approaches. Standardization among interventions proved insufficient.
conclusionsInclusion of co-teachers with Disorders of Intellectual Development is an emerging and important field in higher education as could be shown by this literature review. There is a need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines and adequate institutional resources to support co-teaching involving individuals with Disorders of Intellectual Development in healthcare education. Although inclusive teaching indicates benefits for both, students and educators, their success depends on institutional commitment and overcoming persistent barriers. Ongoing research and policy development are essential to fully realize the potential of co-productive educational models in fostering genuine inclusion and improving healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.