ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Context-agnostic machine learning for Parkinson's disease motor symptom detection using wearable sensors.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParkinson's disease is a rapidly growing neurodegenerative disorder with various motor and non-motor symptoms, affecting millions of people worldwide. These symptoms demonstrate significant medication-related fluctuations and inter-patient variability, highlighting the need for personalized management. Objective longitudinal symptom monitoring through wearable sensors and machine learning can support individualized care. However, to date, most approaches have been tested in lab-constrained environments. This study aims to develop a modular pipeline to automatically detect three cardinal Parkinson's disease motor symptoms, tremor, bradykinesia, and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in more realistic scenarios.
methodsThe proposed approach was evaluated on three datasets: the Levodopa Response Study and two newly introduced ALAMEDA datasets, containing tri-axial wrist accelerometer data collected with commercial wearable devices during clinical assessments and activities of daily living. For each symptom, separate context-agnostic models were developed using 92 hand-crafted features. Multiple segmentation window lengths and preprocessing techniques, including resampling and dimensionality reduction, alongside various machine learning models, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, decision tree, AdaBoost, and random forest, were explored. Statistical significance between configurations was assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Model interpretability was investigated using Shapley additive explanations to identify highly influential predictors and assess their physiological relevance.
resultsIn the Levodopa Response Study dataset, tremor, bradykinesia, and dyskinesia detection reached 0.664, 0.636, and 0.443 area under the precision-recall curve, respectively, demonstrating scalability in high-complexity settings and revealing physiologically meaningful patterns. When evaluated on the ALAMEDA datasets, tremor and dyskinesia detection achieved 0.879 and 0.648 area under the precision-recall curve, highlighting strong model and feature generalizability. Across symptoms, longer segmentation windows and random forest classifiers performed better, while synthetic oversampling and principal component analysis showed limited impact.
conclusionsAutomated Parkinson's disease symptom detection is feasible in more realistic, free-living conditions, with only a slight performance decrease despite substantially increased complexity. With carefully selected features and pipeline components, the objective, unobtrusive monitoring of motor symptoms can support personalized, evidence-based treatment suggestions, eventually improving patients' quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.