ArticleBMC health services research2026
Toward a comprehensive, survivor-centered measure of barriers and facilitators to sexual assault services: findings from cognitive interviews.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough medical, mental health, advocacy, and legal services exist for people who have experienced sexual assault, usage rates remain low, particularly among survivors from historically marginalized backgrounds. A review of existing measures assessing barriers and facilitators to post-assault services found that existing measures had limited inclusion of facilitators and community-level and identity-specific barriers, and were rarely developed with input from people who have experienced sexual assault. To address these gaps, we used cognitive interviews to develop and refine a preliminary measure assessing barriers and facilitators to post-sexual assault service-seeking across the social-ecological model.
methodWe conducted five iterative rounds of cognitive interviews (N = 27) via videoconference between May 2024 and March 2025 with a diverse sample of people who had experienced sexual assault. Using verbal probing techniques, we assessed participants' comprehension, interpretation, and responses to survey items and gathered feedback on item clarity, relevance, and coverage. Interview data were analyzed using directed content analysis within a social-ecological model that combined deductive main categories with inductively identified categories and subcategories. Items were revised iteratively across survey versions based on participant feedback.
resultsParticipants identified barriers that existing measures had not adequately assessed, including lack of identity and culturally affirming services, language and geographic access barriers, social stigma, mistrust of systems, fear of repercussions, and a range of mental, emotional, and physical challenges. New facilitators included integrative and wraparound service models and trust in services. Participants also identified clarity concerns related to terminology that assumed familiarity with formal service systems and item structures that combined conceptually distinct experiences. Participant feedback informed iterative revisions to improve item clarity, reduce redundancy, and expand coverage of underrepresented barriers and facilitators.
conclusionsCognitive interviews with people who have experienced sexual assault revealed critical gaps in how existing measures assess barriers and facilitators to post-sexual assault service-seeking. Findings also highlighted how terminology and item structure can undermine response accuracy for survivors from diverse survivor backgrounds. Psychometric validation of the revised measure is underway to support its use in research and practice aimed at improving service access for underserved survivors. Finally, these findings reflect the U.S. service, legal, and sociopolitical context in which we developed the measure and may not transfer to other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.