Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469781›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Work-life spillover, clinical decision-making, and quality of care in nursing: the role of negative interference.

Ayşe Emi̇noğlu Güven, Burcu Çakı Döner, Mina Muşluoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayşe Emi̇noğlu GüvenGaziantep Islam Science and Technology, Department of Nursing, University of Health Sciences, Gaziantep, Turkey. ayse.11.eminoglu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-5529
Burcu Çakı DönerGaziantep Islam Science and Technology, Department of Nursing, University of Health Sciences, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3592-5121
Mina MuşluoğluGaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1837-3126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWork-life balance has emerged as a critical issue in nursing, directly influencing job satisfaction, professional performance, and patient outcomes. Nurses' ability to make timely and effective clinical decisions is essential for delivering high-quality care, yet it may be compromised by imbalances in their personal and professional lives.

aimThis study evaluated the relationship between nurses' work-life balance and their clinical decision-making skills and the quality of nursing care they provide.

methodsThe study was cross-sectional with 252 nurses working in a hospital between March 21 and April 10, 2025. The data were collected using the Descriptive Information Form, Work Life Balance Scale, Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing and Quality Nursing Care Scale. Data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation and multiple regression analyses.

resultsAccording to the study findings, nurses' work-life balance (48.55 ± 8.93) was below average, while their clinical decision-making (134.90 ± 13.68) and perceptions of quality nursing care (163.04 ± 18.05) were significantly above average. A positive and significant correlation (r: 0.369, p < 0.001) was found between nurses' clinical decision-making scores and the level of quality nursing care; No significant correlation was found between work-life balance and clinical decision-making and quality nursing care (p > 0.05). However, a negative and significant relationship was found between the Negative Impact of Life on Work and the Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Scale (r=-0.240, p < 0.001). A positive and significant correlation was found between the Negative Impact of Work on Life and the Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Scale (r = 0.140, p = 0.027) and the Quality Nursing Care Scale (r = 0.184, p = 0.003).

conclusionWhile the findings indicate that overall work-life balance is not associated with clinical decision-making and quality nursing care, they do suggest that life, and the negative impact of work on life, play a critical role. Therefore, nurses demonstrate that achieving work-life balance is a critical factor not only for individual well-being but also for patient safety and quality of care. The finding of a significant negative correlation between nurses' low work-life balance and the negative impact of work on life, clinical decision-making, and quality nursing care suggests that developing strategies to support work-life balance at the institutional level will be an important step toward improving the sustainability and quality of nursing services. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Clinical decision-makingNursing careNursing workforcePatient safetyWork-life balance

Identifiers

PMID42469781
PMCPMC13660270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.