ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Knowledge and perception of end-of-life bioethics among medical students. A comparative study between the University of Verona (Italy) and the University of Halle (Germany).
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnd-of-life care raises complex ethical and legal questions shaped by national frameworks, cultural contexts, and personal beliefs. This comparative study explores how fifth-year medical students in Verona (Italy) and in Halle (Germany) understand and evaluate key end-of-life practices, including advance directives, withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, palliative care, medically assisted suicide, and life termination through drugs. The study also examines whether religiosity influences ethical orientations.
methodsA structured questionnaire consisting of 16 closed-ended items and one open question was administered to fifth-year medical students at the University of Verona and the University of Halle during the 2024-2025 academic year. Items assessed knowledge of legal frameworks, ethical attitudes, personal experiences with dying patients, and perceived educational preparedness. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and chi-square tests were used to compare cohorts, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 259 valid responses were analyzed. Students in both countries showed strong consensus regarding the legitimacy and clinical usefulness of advance directives and the central role of palliative care. Acceptance of withholding or withdrawing treatment was high in both cohorts, though slightly higher in Germany. Marked differences emerged regarding life termination through drugs, with Italian students expressing more permissive and polarized positions and German students showing more moderate and cautious responses. Attitudes toward medically assisted suicide were broadly permissive in both groups, with religiosity emerging as a consistent predictor of more restrictive positions, particularly in Italy.
conclusionsWhile future physicians in both countries share core commitments to patient autonomy and palliative care, significant differences persist in their evaluation of practices intended to hasten death. These findings suggest that ethical orientations at the end of life are shaped not only by shared professional principles but also by national cultural environments and personal belief systems. Comparative research among medical students offers valuable insight into how medico-legal contexts and education influence emerging professional ethics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.