ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Personality-based subgroup identification and psychological symptom patterns in adolescent male new psychoactive substance users: implications for targeted intervention.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAdolescent new psychoactive substance (NPS) users represent a high-risk population with complex psychological needs that remain insufficiently characterized, limiting the development of targeted rehabilitation interventions. This study aimed to (1) characterize the personality trait profiles and psychological symptom patterns of adolescent NPS users undergoing compulsory drug rehabilitation relative to normative standards; (2) identify empirically derived personality-based subgroups within this population; and (3) examine differential psychological symptom patterns across identified subgroups to inform precision intervention design.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 60 adolescent male participants (mean age = 17.2 ± 1.9 years) recruited from a compulsory drug rehabilitation facility in Shandong Province, China. Participants completed a multimodal assessment battery comprising Cattell's 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF), the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Personality-based subgroups were identified using a two-stage cluster analysis (Ward's method followed by K-means), with cluster quality evaluated via Average Silhouette Width and split-sample Adjusted Rand Index. Between-cluster differences in psychological symptom profiles were examined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc comparisons. Hierarchical multiple regression identified independent personality predictors of overall psychological distress (SCL-90-R Global Severity Index, GSI).
resultsFourteen of 16 personality factors deviated significantly from Chinese adolescent norms (all corrected p < .05), with the largest deviations observed for Tension (Q4; d = 1.38), Rule-Consciousness (G; d = 1.30↓), Apprehension (O; d = 1.24), and Emotional Stability (C; d = 1.13↓). Overall psychological distress was pervasive, with 81.7% of participants exceeding the GSI clinical significance threshold (GSI ≥ 1.0; mean GSI = 1.52 ± 0.43). Paranoid Ideation emerged as the most severely elevated SCL-90-R dimension (d = 1.39), followed by Interpersonal Sensitivity (d = 1.09) and Anxiety (d = 1.02). Cluster analysis identified three empirically stable personality-based subgroups: Dysregulated-Hostile (n = 22, 36.7%), Anxious-Withdrawn (n = 21, 35.0%), and Impulsive-Sensation-Seeking (n = 17, 28.3%; Average Silhouette Width = 0.58; split-sample ARI = 0.71). The three clusters demonstrated clinically meaningful differential symptom profiles: the Dysregulated-Hostile cluster was characterized by elevated Hostility and Paranoid Ideation; the Anxious-Withdrawn cluster by elevated Anxiety, Depression, and Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms; and the Impulsive-Sensation-Seeking cluster by relatively lower overall distress with elevated personality disorder tendencies. Hierarchical regression revealed that 16PF personality factors explained an additional 48.7% of variance in GSI beyond demographic covariates (ΔR² = 0.487, ΔF(6, 49) = 14.38, p < .001), with Tension (Q4; β = 0.318), Emotional Stability (C; β = -0.312), and Apprehension (O; β = 0.287) as the strongest independent predictors.
conclusionsAdolescent NPS users in compulsory rehabilitation present a distinctive high-risk personality configuration and a substantial psychological distress burden that is not uniformly distributed across the population. Three empirically derived personality-based subgroups with differential symptom profiles provide preliminary, hypothesis-generating evidence that should be validated in a larger, multisite cohort before informing the development of differentiated, precision intervention strategies. Personality assessment at treatment intake-particularly targeting Tension, Emotional Stability, and Apprehension-offers clinically meaningful predictive information for distress severity that substantially exceeds demographic screening alone. These findings complement the gut microbiota-exercise intervention framework being developed in our companion, currently in-press trial and represent a critical step toward a precision medicine model for adolescent NPS rehabilitation that integrates personality-based stratification with physiologically targeted exercise interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.