ArticleBMC oral health2026
Comparative evaluation of fiber and metal posts on mandibular bone microstructure: a fractal dimension analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the effects of prefabricated fiber and metal posts on mandibular trabecular bone microarchitecture by comparing fractal dimension values derived from panoramic radiographs at pre-treatment and post-treatment time points.
methodsA cohort of 101 individuals (50 fiber posts, 51 metal posts) was analyzed. To ensure comparability, both groups were matched regarding age, gender (p > 0.05). Digital panoramic radiographs were obtained at pre-treatment and post-treatment time points. Images were saved in uncompressed Tagged Image File Format and processed using ImageJ software. Bone complexity was quantified using the White and Rudolph box-counting method. Standardized Regions of Interest (50 × 50 pixels) were precisely defined in the peri-radicular bone, strictly excluding anatomical landmarks such as the mandibular canal and mental foramen. Intra-observer reliability was verified via the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Due to the non-normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test), data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-treatment fractal dimension values within the fiber and metal post groups (p > 0.05). Inter-group comparisons revealed no significant disparity in trabecular bone complexity between the two post systems (p > 0.05). Furthermore, gender did not exert a significant influence on the fractal metrics. Sensitivity power analysis confirmed that the sample size was sufficient to detect clinically relevant changes.
conclusionThe findings indicate that prefabricated fiber and metal posts produce similar short-term effects on mandibular trabecular bone microarchitecture, with no significant difference in fractal dimension values either within or between groups. From a clinical perspective, fractal analysis did not reveal a detectable difference in peri-radicular trabecular bone complexity between the two post systems over a one-year follow-up; this radiograph-based observation may provide an additional consideration for material selection when esthetic, financial considerations are weighed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.