ArticleBMC medical education2026
The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching for gynecology resident.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the combined PBL-CBL teaching method based on Thorndike's Learning Theory in the education of bacterial resistance detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical residency training plays a crucial role in cultivating competent gynecologists capable of integrating theoretical knowledge with clinical practice. However, traditional lecture-based teaching in China often limits resident engagement and practical experience due to heavy clinical workloads and restricted patient access, particularly in gynecology. To address these challenges, we implemented a combined problem-based learning and case-based learning (PBL-CBL) model aimed at enhancing residents' clinical reasoning, learning initiative, and satisfaction.
methodsA prospective quasi-experimental educational study was conducted among 50 gynecology residents at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between September 2018 and July 2025. Participants were assigned to either a PBL-CBL group or a traditional lecture-based group. Both groups received instruction on abnormal uterine bleeding using identical materials, instructors, and class hours. Teaching effectiveness was evaluated through pre- and post-course theoretical and skills examinations, as well as an anonymous questionnaire assessing learning interest, initiative, and satisfaction. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0, with P < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsBoth groups showed significant improvement in theoretical and skills scores after the course. While there was no significant difference in overall theoretical or skills examination scores between groups, the PBL-CBL group achieved higher post-class case analysis scores (41.6 ± 3.44 vs. 38.08 ± 3.42, P = 0.001) and reported greater satisfaction (82.92 ± 4.9 vs. 79.67 ± 3.49, P = 0.01). Questionnaire results indicated that the PBL-CBL model significantly enhanced residents' learning interest, initiative, and critical thinking ability compared with traditional teaching.
conclusionsThe integrated PBL-CBL teaching model effectively improved gynecology residents' reasoning ability, engagement, and satisfaction without compromising theoretical or procedural performance. This hybrid approach offers a feasible and scalable pedagogical innovation for residency programs, particularly in clinical settings where direct patient exposure is limited. Adoption of this model may contribute to cultivating reflective, competent, and patient-centered gynecologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.