ArticleBMC public health2026
Higher SARS-CoV-2 infection burden among racialized individuals: evidence from Canadian serology data.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCOVID-19 infection risk has not been evenly distributed across racial groups, with exposure being shaped by social and structural factors. The emergence of highly transmissible variants (i.e., Omicron) dramatically increased infection rates. However, it remains unclear whether racial disparities in infection risk disappeared or persisted over the course of the pandemic.
objectiveTo understand how SARS-CoV-2 infection risk differed between racial groups in Canada and whether those disparities changed with the Omicron variant.
methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence data from the Canadian Blood Services serosurveillance program (June 2020 to April 2023) using a previously described dynamic susceptible-infection model, while accounting for seroreversion. Race-specific force of infection was estimated for the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods (with the emergence of Omicron defined as beginning December 26, 2021).
resultsPrior to Omicron, racialized individuals had a 121% higher force of infection (IRR = 2.205; 95% CI: 2.115-2.299). During the Omicron period, infection rates rose significantly within each racial group relative to the pre-Omicron period, with a 55.52-fold increase among White individuals and a 31.27-fold increase among racialized individuals. Despite this, racialized individuals remained disproportionately affected following the emergence of Omicron, with 24% higher infection rates than those of their White counterparts (IRR = 1.242; 95% CI: 1.231-1.253).
conclusionWidespread infection during Omicron did not result in epidemiologic equity, as racialized populations continued to experience higher infection risk despite crude seroprevalence depicting convergence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.