ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Purpose in life as a predictor of capability well-being among older adults in Thailand: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContemporary discussions on the definition of health, as highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO), emphasize the significant role of spiritual health (SH) in contributing to overall well-being, alongside physical, mental, and social dimensions. In Thailand, the rapidly ageing population has elevated the importance of improving the well-being of older adults, making it a critical national concern. In this context, SH plays a crucial role and is recognized in Thai national legislation as a key element of health. However, specific research on the relationship between SH and well-being among Thai older adults remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the current state of well-being among independent older adults in Central Thailand and to examine factors associated with SH and well-being.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1 to July 31, 2025, using a Paper-based questionnaire survey targeting 500 older adults aged 60 and over within Ratchaburi Province, central Thailand. The well-being was assessed using the ICECAP-O (ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people). Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage) and univariate analysis (one-way ANOVA, t-test) were conducted. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to examine the relationships between well-being, socioeconomic characteristics, health perception, and the Purpose in Life (PIL) test. Stata/BE17.0 was used, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. This study was approved by the ethics review boards of both countries' institutions: Juntendo University, Japan (E23-0364-M03), and Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (COA No.197/68).
resultsAmong the 471 valid responses, the median ICECAP-O tariff scores was 0.868, and participants were classified into low (10.6%), moderate (33.8%), and high (55.6%) PIL groups. In multivariate linear regression analysis, the adjusted predictive margins revealed a stepwise gradient, where ICECAP-O tariff scores for the moderate and high PIL groups were 0.098 and 0.149 points higher, respectively, compared to the low PIL group (0.735). Subjective health, economic status, and caregiving roles were also positive predictors, whereas older age was negatively associated.
conclusionGiven the critical role of spiritual health, targeted strategies to promote PIL are needed to enhance healthy aging. The findings highlight PIL as the strongest predictor of capability well-being, alongside subjective health and financial factors within the Thai cultural context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469665What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.