ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
A challenging diagnosis of syphilis in a patient with a testicular lump: a case report.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSyphilis is a re-emerging sexually transmitted infection known for its heterogeneous clinical manifestations and ability to mimic neoplastic, inflammatory, and infectious diseases. Testicular involvement is rare and may radiologically resemble testicular cancer, frequently leading to unnecessary orchiectomy. We report a case of syphilitic orchitis initially suspected to be a testicular malignancy, highlighting the importance of including syphilis in the differential diagnosis of atypical testicular lesions. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously healthy 36-year-old man presented with a two-day history of dull right testicular pain associated with a palpable lump and a faint skin rash present for approximately two weeks. Ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound identified a 9-12 mm hypoechoic hypovascular intratesticular lesion suspicious for malignancy. Computed tomography showed no metastatic lesions, and serum tumor markers (LDH, HCG, AFP) were within normal ranges. A right orchifunicolectomy was performed. Histopathological examination revealed dense interstitial inflammatory infiltrates rich in plasma cells and lymphocytes without evidence of neoplasia. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated numerous Treponema pallidum spirochetes within the lesion and epididymis, establishing the diagnosis of syphilitic orchitis. Serologic tests confirmed syphilis infection (TPHA positive; VDRL 1:128). Screening test for human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections was negative. Based on pathological findings and the concomitant skin rash, secondary syphilis with testicular involvement was diagnosed. The patient was treated with intramuscular benzathine penicillin G, achieving complete serologic response, with no recurrence after two years of follow-up.
conclusionsSyphilitic orchitis is an uncommon but clinically relevant differential diagnosis of testicular masses. In the context of increasing syphilis incidence, particularly among high-risk populations, clinicians should consider serologic screening for Treponema pallidum in patients with atypical testicular lesions and negative tumor markers. Early recognition may support a conservative management approach, preventing unnecessary surgical procedures and ensuring prompt treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.