Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469653›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Enhancing alfalfa breeding through genomic prediction with exotic germplasm resources.

Shufen Chen, Meng Lin, Neal W Tilhou, Bhoja R Basnet, Dongyan Zhao, Craig T Beil, Heathcliffe Riday, Moira J Sheehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shufen ChenBreeding Insight, Cornell University, 525 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-2598
Meng LinBreeding Insight, Cornell University, 525 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5216-6430
Neal W TilhouUS Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, 1925 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5221-1809
Bhoja R BasnetBreeding Insight, Cornell University, 525 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1693-4807
Dongyan ZhaoBreeding Insight, Cornell University, 525 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-8416
Craig T BeilBreeding Insight, Cornell University, 525 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-9987
Heathcliffe RidayUS Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, 1925 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. heathcliffe.riday@usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-6691
Moira J SheehanBreeding Insight, Cornell University, 525 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. moirasheehan@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-2165

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 5090-21500-002-000-DAgricultural Research Service 8062-21000-052-020-A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adoption of molecular breeding methods and genomic selection in alfalfa breeding has lagged behind that of major crops such as corn and soybean. Discovery and introgression of native traits into new cultivars desired by growers requires breeders and pre-breeders to leverage genomic information from exotic germplasm sources into their breeding pipelines.

resultsWe investigated the effects on genomic predictive ability when the composition and proportions of the germplasm used in the training and test sets vary in genomic prediction schemes. We used a set of 780 alfalfa samples collected from different geographic origins (CASIA, EURO, OTTM, and SIBR) plus U.S. breeding materials (Check) evaluated in a multi-year field trial for growth habit (GH), plant height (HGT), and plant vigor (VIG), and genotyped using the alfalfa 3 K DArTag panel. The genotyping results revealed distinct patterns of linkage disequilibrium across the five germplasm subgroups. Genomic prediction across the entire population outperformed predictions within individual subgroups. Further optimization was achieved by systematically varying the proportion of samples from each of the five subgroups in the training set (10-90%). Additionally, when increasing the number of test subgroup samples to the training set, the increased genetic relatedness between the training and test sets could be a major driver of improved predictive performance.

conclusionsOverall, these results indicate that successful genomic prediction in alfalfa requires not only expanding training set sizes but also strategically incorporating highly diverse germplasm and evaluating newly introduced base populations to maximize predictive ability.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantMedicago sativaPlant BreedingGenomicsGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumAlfalfaDArTag genotypingExotic germplasmGenomic predictionPerennial cover crop

Identifiers

PMID42469653
PMCPMC13660186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.