ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Comparative chloroplast genome analysis reveals genetic differentiation and maternal introgression in tea plants (Camellia sinensis) from Shaoyang, China.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the tea germplasm resources in the Shaoyang area of south-west Hunan Province, China, are extremely diverse, knowledge of the maternal lineages and adaptive evolution of these resources is still limited. The genetic relationship of the populations in Tingping Township (Chengbu County) has long been a focus of attention, but due to insufficient genetic information, it was not determined to which branch they belonged in the phylogenetic tree.
resultsBy integrating the newly sequenced chloroplast genomes of Tingping tea plants with nine other accessions, we built a robust dataset comprising 15 samples that representing the broader area of Shaoyang. These plastomes range in size from 156,697 to 157,098 bp and have the typical quadripartite structure. Comparative genomic analysis of these chloroplast genomes revealed high sequence conservation (90-100% identity) with no rearrangements or large indels, yet identified 19 hypervariable intergenic regions (e.g., trnH-psbA, trnC-petN, ndhF-rpl32) and five divergent protein-coding genes (rpoC2, ycf2, ndhB, ccsA, ndhE) concentrated in non-coding regions. Analysis of inverted repeat (IR) dynamics uncovered three distinct structural architectures-standard type, IR-contracted type, and wild-specialized type-suggesting a more complex evolutionary trajectory than initially assumed. Based on statistical analyses using the PAML branch-site model, chloroplast genes in the target clade were not subject to positive selection, further supporting the view that the chloroplast genome is highly conserved. Our phylogeny also reveals a significant "West Large vs East Small" leaf type division. The Tingping samples exhibit a mosaic maternal ancestry comprising both var. assamica and var. sinensis chloroplast lineages, indicating that this region has experienced complex historical gene flow, likely associated with cultivation and seed exchange. These chloroplast genome patterns are consistent with maternal lineage introgression (chloroplast capture), although nuclear markers would be required to confirm true introgression and to distinguish ancient divergence from recent admixture.
conclusionsThis study provides the map of the maternal genetic structure of Shaoyang tea plants. The discovery of a distinct maternal lineage in 'zhuyedong' and complex patterns consistent with chloroplast capture in Tingping not only restructures our understanding of local tea evolution but also provides an indispensable genetic basis for the conservation of gene pools and the breeding of excellent tea varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.