ReviewBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Integrating multiple hematologic inflammatory indices into a principal component analysis-derived inflammatory burden score for coronary artery disease.
Review in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplete blood count-derived inflammatory indices have been associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), but their substantial overlap may limit interpretability when assessed individually. We used principal component analysis (PCA) to integrate six commonly used inflammatory indices into a composite Inflammatory Burden Score (IBS) and evaluated its association with angiographically confirmed CAD alongside the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI).
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 1,261 individuals (477 with CAD and 784 without CAD) who underwent invasive coronary angiography at a tertiary referral center. PCA was applied to six standardized inflammatory indices, and the first principal component was retained as the IBS. Hierarchical logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the incremental contribution of IBS and PNI beyond conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration metrics, and likelihood-ratio testing. XGBoost and SHAP analyses were performed as complementary explainable machine-learning approaches.
resultsThe first principal component explained 68.1% of the total variance across inflammatory indices, with all variables contributing positively to the composite score. IBS was significantly higher among participants with CAD (p < 0.001). In univariable analyses, both IBS (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.17, p < 0.001) and PNI (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.14, p < 0.001) were associated with CAD. After adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors, IBS (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19) and PNI (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.20) remained independently associated with CAD. Addition of either IBS or PNI significantly improved model fit (both likelihood-ratio test p < 0.001). The AUC increased from 0.727 in the conventional risk-factor model to 0.734 after inclusion of IBS and to 0.737 after inclusion of PNI. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.802, while SHAP analysis identified age and sex as the dominant predictors, followed by IBS and PNI.
conclusionsIn this single-center cross-sectional cohort, a PCA-derived inflammatory burden score and the Prognostic Nutritional Index were independently associated with angiographically confirmed CAD beyond conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Both measures contributed similarly in explainable machine-learning analyses. These findings are exploratory and require prospective external validation before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.