Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42469625›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026

Source-level α periodic power in visual and default mode networks predicts topiramate treatment response in migraine.

Siyuan Xie, Chenghui Pi, Kang Jin, Longteng Ma, Yunyun Huo, Miaomiao Hu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Suyuan Tai, Jiayin Lin, Shengyuan Yu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Siyuan Xie *Department of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Chenghui Pi *Department of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Kang JinDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Longteng MaDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yunyun HuoDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Miaomiao HuDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Xiaoyan ZhangDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Suyuan TaiDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jiayin LinDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Shengyuan YuDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Ye RanDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China. ranyenk@126.com.
Zhao DongDepartment of Neurology, International Headache Center, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road 28, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China. dong_zhaozhao@126.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-2569

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2508703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is highly heterogeneous, and patients exhibit substantial variability in their responses to preventive treatment. The dose-escalation strategy of topiramate further complicates early evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. Identifying neurobiological markers that can predict treatment response is therefore essential for individualized therapy. In this study, we constructed predictive models based on individualized periodic and aperiodic power features derived from source-reconstructed electroencephalography (EEG) to identify electrophysiological indicators associated with topiramate efficacy, thereby providing a foundation for personalized prediction in migraine prevention.

methodsIn total, 112 patients with episodic migraine without aura received baseline EEG assessment and subsequently completed 3 months of topiramate treatment. EEG signals were source-reconstructed, and periodic and aperiodic components were separated using FOOOF with adjustment by each participant's individual α frequency (IAF). Predictive models were developed using XGBoost, with stratified cross-validation and 0.632 + bootstrap used to estimate generalization performance. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis quantified feature contributions. Correlation analysis and Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) regression were subsequently performed to examine the relationships between key features and treatment outcomes.

resultsThe model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.859 in identifying treatment responders. SHAP analysis indicated that the most influential features were periodic α-band power localized to the cuneus, pericalcarine cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, frontal pole, and precuneus. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the functional brain networks comprising these regions showed that the principal components of the visual network (VN) and default mode network (DMN) were significantly associated with headache improvement, and their joint inclusion in a LOOCV regression model explained 26.1% of the variance in treatment efficacy.

conclusionPeriodic α activity represents a strong predictive biomarker of topiramate efficacy, with higher α power indicating poorer clinical response. These findings provide an interpretable neurobiological basis for individualized prediction in migraine preventive therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmDefault Mode NetworkMigraine DisordersMigraine without AuraNeuroprotective AgentsTopiramateAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultNeuroprotective AgentsTopiramateEEGMigrainePredictive modelingTopiramate

Identifiers

PMID42469625
PMCPMC13670753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.