ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
Preliminary Validation of a Novel Genetic Knowledge Scale for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Evaluation of Face Validity and Core Concepts.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facilitating patient-informed decision making is central to the genetic counseling practice. The Multidimensional Model of Informed Choice (MMIC) evaluates informed decisions in genetic testing, but validated MMIC measures for inherited cardiac conditions are lacking. This study aimed to begin validating an 8-item true/false knowledge scale specific to familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Once validated, this scale will form part of an MMIC measure to assess informed choice in the context of genetic testing for this condition. Ten semi-structured cognitive interviews were conducted to examine face validity and the importance of concepts within the scale. A traffic light coding system was used to analyze participant responses. All participants interpreted the items correctly, and minor revisions were made to improve the clarity of six items. Most participants (n = 9) considered all concepts covered by the knowledge scale to be either helpful or necessary to make a decision about genetic testing for FH. This study initiated the validation of a novel genetic knowledge scale specific to FH, to be used as part of a larger measure to assess patient informed choice in the context of genetic testing for this condition. The development and future validation of the genetic knowledge scale for FH can be used in novel research targeted at maximizing patient informed choice among this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.