ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Working memory strategies in children aged 7-10 years.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While working memory strategies are well documented in adults, little is known about the use and effectiveness of these strategies in children. This study examined self-reported strategy use in children aged 7-10 years on working memory tasks, including those with demands related to everyday and classroom activities. Participants were a subset of 63 children from a working memory training trial in primary school-aged children that found no intervention effects up to 6 months post intervention. At the immediate post-intervention follow-up, children completed five working memory tasks: two backward span tasks (letters and digits), two following instructions tasks (letters and objects), and one n-back task (objects). Children then participated in a semi-structured one-on-one interview about the strategies they used on each task. Strategy use was prevalent across all working memory tasks and was generally associated with superior performance. A range of task-general and task-specific strategies were reported. Participants tended to rely on a single rather than multiple strategies, and more often favored a manipulation rather than maintenance strategy type. While certain strategies, the number of strategies used, and strategy type were linked to superior performance on select working memory tasks, the associations were not consistent across all tasks. These results show that strategic behavior during middle childhood, as in adults, is linked to performance on working memory tasks related to everyday and classroom activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.