ReviewJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Health information systems integrating patient-reported outcomes and experience: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionValue-based healthcare (VBHC) implementation is seen as a priority in many healthcare systems worldwide because it advocates for the best health outcomes that matter to patients at the best cost. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly used to capture this patient's perspective on their health and their experience of care. Consequently, to promote VBHC, an international emergence of health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs has developed.
objectivesThe goal of our study was to (1) identify the main existing health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs and (2) describe how their use supports VBHC and value-based decision-making at meso or macro levels.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. We conducted a systematic search across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Academic Search Complete databases. We carried out a mixed thematic analysis using deductive (frameworks of Franklin et al. and CIHI) and inductive approaches.
resultsWe screened 7,497 papers from which the title and abstract of 526 papers were identified as relevant for full-text review. A total of 12 papers were retained for analysis identifying systems from six different countries. We described these systems according to four types of governance strategies. PROMs and PREMs tools were selected according to the population segments chosen. They were collected through paper, phone, and digital technologies. Barriers such as lack of time, administrative burden, reluctance to implementation and facilitators such as identifying champions, integrating patients into the process, efficient communication were described. The real-time reporting of data was an interesting innovation that was developed in several systems. PROMs and PREMs were used for benchmarking, quality improvement, performance evaluation but no concrete example of use were reported.
conclusionThis scoping review identifies international initiatives of health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs. The mechanisms use to support value-based decision-making with this data at meso and macro levels are yet to be fully described. Nonetheless, these results will enable countries to learn from the approaches of others to improve the development and implementation of similar initiatives to support value-based healthcare decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42469537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.